Exploring the wonders of creation through a 50mm lens...and other lenses too.

It didn’t take long after getting my 105mm f/2.8 macro lens for it to launch itself up to the top of my list of favorite pieces of photography gear. While I don’t often take super close-up shots like this with it, I do enjoy the freedom to essentially get as close to my subject as I want without wondering whether the lens will be capable of getting it in focus. It’s really more about the freedom it offers than the ability to take macro shots like this one, but every now and then when the opportunity presents itself, I really do appreciate the ability to capture images such as this simple fly on a leaf. Of course the gear is just one component of the equation; there’s also composition, lighting, exposure setting, subject framing choices, and even seeing photographic opportunities in the first place that all come into play in order to get good shots. And those are exactly what led to this picture of a fly sitting on a leaf, just kind of minding its own business while I moved ever-close with my camera until I got the photo you see here.

I took this while on our annual family vacation in Kansas while walking between cabins with my brother Phil, both of us with cameras in hand while we chatted about family, kids, jobs, and the other sorts of pleasant topics that come up on a lazy day like that. He’s also a big fan of macro photography and even likes to take the concept of close-up photos a step further with focus stacking. While I’ve dabbled in that a time or two I really don’t enjoy the time and effort it takes to pull off a really solid stacking operation, and instead prefer to get my photos with a single exposure and just use a smaller aperture if I want a wider depth of field. To each their own though, and for those readers who like combining dozens or even hundreds of shots into a final composition I say go for it! Good for you, and I’m sure you get some cool results. But for me, if I can get what I want with a single click of the shutter and then be on my way, I’m a happy camper.

Anyway, stacking soliloquy aside, I like how this shot turned out and I’m glad I had the chance to get it. I shot it at f/22, 1/250 second, ISO 1000 (cleaned up with Lightroom AI Denoise), and one of my favorite parts of the image is the detail in the fly’s compound eyes. If you click through to the original on Flickr and zoom in you can see hundreds of individual eye components, along with many microscopic hairs bordering the head, which is the kind of detail that’s hard to get using a wider aperture since the depth of field would be so insanely shallow. I also like the angled position of the fly so you’re not seeing it entirely head-on or in profile view. It gives the insect a sense of depth and three-dimensionality that I really like.

I don’t think I’ll take much time to shoot macro photos of flies anytime soon after this one, but this was a cool shot to take and, like Hamilton, I’m glad I didn’t throw it away :)

This is the kind of photo that makes me really glad to have Weekly Fifty. I like having this blog to help me learn, grow, refine, and hone my photography skills but also as a way to share pictures that I enjoy taking if for no other reason than I think they’re kind of cool. And that’s definitely the case here :)

My kids go to a lot of programs put on by the local public library, especially in the summer. The staff there does an outstanding job of having a full slate of fun, interactive, often educational but sometimes just simply enjoyable activities for kids to take part in throughout the summer, and our boys go to as many as they can unless we have some sort of schedule conflict. One such event was all about space, and when I picked up the boys afterwards they were excitedly telling me about how they saw Venus next to the moon in broad daylight without a telescope or any other visual aid. Now, I’ve seen Venus and the Moon dance near each other pretty often over the years but always at night and usually in the hour or so after the sun goes down. What I had not witnessed, partly because I didn’t even realize such a thing was even possible, was this pair visible in broad daylight with no special viewing tools required.

After we got home the kids relayed to my wife what they had just told me, so the four of us spent the next 15 minutes in the front yard staring up at the sky like we were looking for aliens in a sci-fi movie. There it was, plain as day, right overhead: A crescent moon flanked by none other than the planet Venus. I ran inside to get my camera (I’m no astrophotographer; the best I could do was my D500 and 70-200mm lens) so I could document the scene, and got the photo you see here. There’s really not much to it on a technical level: f/8, 1/500 second, ISO 100, shot at 200mm and cropped way in. But what it shows, and the experience we all had looking at it, is something far different from most of my normal Weekly Fifty shots. It was a fun, unique, and fascinating moment that all but evaporated soon afterwards, as the orbits of these two celestial bodies took them ever farther apart. Within the span of one or two hours it was essentially gone, and I haven’t seen anything like it since. But I’ve got this shot, and a fun story, and that’s good enough for me.

This photo is kind of a continuation of some themes that have wound their way through my photos recently, and though that was not really my intent I do acknowledge that it might have crept in there subconsciously in one way or another. First, and most obvious, is that this is very clearly a coneflower and, as such, bears a striking similarity to the other coneflower photos I have taken and shared recently here on Weekly Fifty. Another is that the general composition, that of a single centered subject framed by lights on either side, is one I have been exploring recently as well. And finally, I think on some level, whether I’m aware of it or not, I’m still trying to atone for the subpar nature of this shot I shared not too long ago–the one that, despite kind of working on a technical level, just didn’t look right in the end despite all my fiddling with sliders in Lightroom.

I shot this, as I did with many others recently, while walking from my car to my building on the way to work just as the sun was coming up. The framing here was deliberate: I moved myself around, kind of kneel-walking around the pavement with my Nikon D750 held out in front of me with Live View enabled, until I had the composition just how I wanted it: flower in the middle bright spots of light on either side in the top corners. It also had the secondary effect of adding a touch of backlighting to the flower petals which was unexpected but quite cool nonetheless, and then the little extras like spider webs, bits of dust, and even the orange flower poking up in the lower-right corner add a fun sense of depth, texture, and dare I say it, serendipity to the shot.

The one thing I wasn’t quite sure of here was the exposure setting: specifically, what aperture to use in order to get a depth of field that was not too wide and not too narrow. I ended up on f/13 (1/250 second, ISO 2000, which was then corrected in Lightroom with Denoise) and you know what? I’m really happy with how that choice worked out. It really is in this fun sweet spot: sharp subject, blurry background, and a nice falloff from the front of the flower to the back. The stem is blurry too, but not overly so, and the background is blurry but, like the green stalk in the center, not too blurry.

The one thing I don’t really like here is the color. It’s just kind of…bland. Sure it has a nice sense of contrast, but the palette is basically green and white which isn’t all that interesting. Maybe what I should have done was try to use that orange flower in the foreground instead…but no worries. I do like this photo and I think it works fine in most of the ways that really matter to me, and it gives me a few things to consider the next time I’m strolling down the sidewalk, camera in hand, just as the sun is peeking over the horizon.

The Super Mario Bros. mushroom power-up is one of the most iconic images in gaming, and perhaps even the broader landscape of popular culture. Its squat, stumpy, anthropomorphic appearance is instantly recognizable, whether made from 256 pixels on the original NES to…whatever they use on the latest Mario games. It’s instantly recognizable as a mushroom, and yet, it’s not often that we see natural phenomenæ that actually resemble it. Or, at least, I don’t recall seeing many mushrooms like the ones in a Mario game in my yard, on hikes, or anywhere. But on a recent rainy morning as I was, and I swear I am not making this up, just walking around in my yard looking for photo opportunities with my Nikon D750 and 105mm macro lens in hand, I came across the little fungal blob featured as today’s photo. I thought it would make an interesting shot, and kind of as an afterthought I also realized that it looked just a tiny bit like its 8-bit counterpart. Though unlike one of the Mario Brothers, I did not attempt to eat it in order to gain super powers. Maybe next time.

The mushroom was about an inch and a half tall, nestled among some ground cover and glistening with a sheen brought on by a night of precipitation. It really did give me the sense that it had just poked up from the ground, defying the dirt and gravity in the process, and was triumphantly announcing its presence to any who happened to be in the area. Such as me :) I lowered my camera to the ground, dialed in an aperture of f/16, and fired off a couple shots at slightly different angles. Unlike last week’s mushroom photo I really didn’t consider a variety of vantage points; I knew that this view would give me the photo I was looking for, complete with green grass in the background and even one blade in the foreground for context but also to reinforce the idea that the viewer was peeking into a bit of a hidden world. I particularly liked the rich colors present in every portion of the frame: deep oranges, rich reds, bright greens, and brown earthtones throughout. What really struck me though was all the dirt specks on the cap of the mushroom, and the bright spot of light on the top left portion of the bulbous dome. It really helps sell how wet everything was, which doesn’t really come through too well in the other elements such as the grass and leaves.

This photo, in a sense, is everything I like about taking pictures. It’s an interesting subject that I was able to capture just a few feet from my house, and in doing so it forced me to look at something familiar in a new way. I’m not saying that all pictures have to do that kind of thing, and sometimes it’s fun to just go out and shoot everyday things like food, cars, fences, light posts, and other normal objects for no particular reason than you just want to. I certainly do, and anything that gets your camera off the shelf and into your hands is a good thing. But sometimes it’s also cool to push just a little bit more, and find ways to use photography to see the familiar, the pedestrian, the incredibly normal, in a way that is anything but.

Twelve years ago I used my old Nikon D200 and 50mm f/1.8 lens to take this picture of some mushrooms outside my office at work. While it might seem kind of unremarkable to take a photo of a lump of fungus protruding from the ground, I’ve learned that these kinds of scenes are pretty cool; I quite enjoy these photo opportunities when they come about. Maybe it’s because of the fleeting nature of these small helmeted white stalks–they show up and disappear often within the span of a single day. It might also be related to the wet, rainy, overcast weather conditions in which mushrooms are most likely to appear which also just so happen to be ideal for the kinds of photos I like to take. In any case, I really like taking pictures of mushrooms.

The thing about these kinds of shots, though, is that you can’t always plan them out in advance. Or, if you can, I sure haven’t learned how to do it. Case in point: the image featured today. I went out to trim some tree branches on a humid morning after a night of rain, and came across a couple small, domed, white stalks that had popped up overnight. I didn’t even think about mushrooms when I grabbed the ladder and loppers, but after the branches were pruned I ran inside, grabbed my Nikon D750 and 105mm macro lens, and went back out to see if I could get a couple shots. Turns out, I did.

Unlike most other photos I share here on Weekly Fifty, this one was a bit unique in that I had a great deal of options available to me in terms of overall composition. Since the lighting was overcast and fairly even, and since I had plenty of room to maneuver, I basically circled it and took pictures from many different vantage points. There really weren’t any constraints, which meant I could use any of the available backgrounds I wanted: trees, houses, fences, etc. My favorite ended up being what you see here: a break in the trees filled with bright spots of light, with the rest of the frame occupied by grass with the mushroom rising like a spire right in the center. I vacillated between f/13 and f/19, opting for the latter in the final shot due to more overall sharpness and less depth of field, while still making the foreground and background elements plenty blurry. It’s one of those odd, slightly counterintuitive rules I continue to learn when shooting with my macro lens: less (depth of field) often does equal more (impactful compositions).

I hope to continue taking photos of mushrooms when I get the chance–that is, on warm rainy days in the early morning, preferably in my own back, front, or side yard. They are immensely satisfying, and there’s something kind of fun about the ephemeral nature of such subjects: here today, gone tomorrow, maybe one day to reappear…and hopefully when a photographer has camera in hand to capture them.