Exploring the wonders of creation through a 50mm lens...and other lenses too.

Every now and then I leave the house, camera in hand, and think to myself I’m going to get a good photograph today. I just know it. And almost every time that situation arises, I get exactly what I set out for: a good photo. The thing is, though, it’s usually not due to any special situation or circumstance; the results are usually directly related to something a bit more personal, or perhaps, esoteric: my own mindset. I’ve had plenty of occasions to head out the door with the intention of taking an interesting picture and, like the first dove sent by Noah, returned empty-handed. Nothing strikes my eyes as particularly photo-worthy, I don’t have the gear to capture what I had in mind, or I just don’t feel any inspiration.

On the other hand, I’ve encountered numerous times when I went out not necessarily with anything particular in mind, other than the desire to take a picture, and things just sort of click. Nothing is different from a situational standpoint: same location, same gear, same time of day, etc. But by changing my mindset I end up seeing things differently somehow, and finding photos that I wouldn’t normally see in the places where I might not expect.

This week’s image is an example of just such a phenomenon. I brought my Nikon D750 and 105mm macro lens with me to work as I often do, and as I left my car I had a on the way across campus to my building I told myself that I was going to get a picture. I didn’t know what, or where, or how, but I knew I would get something. I took the same route, along the same paths and sidewalks, that I do every day and, as sure as I live and breathe, I began to see things differently. I noticed the sun cresting the horizon, the shadows dancing across familiar brickwork, the clouds floating lazily above me as the sky turned from gray to blue, and greens, blues, reds, and yellows showing up on plants and trees all around me. Normally I just kind of walk past all this and don’t give these kinds of things a second thought, even with my camera in hand, but with my mind in a different place and my heart set on taking a picture, I was able to see everyday sights in an entirely different way.

As soon as I came across this scene I knew it would make an interesting photograph, and immediately set to work. I hoisted my camera up to my eye, set an f/11 aperture, and took a few shots. They were fine, but with the flower properly exposed the background was entirely blown out and, as a result, unrecoverable by bringing down the highlights in Lightroom. Not good. So I dialed in -2EV exposure compensation, and thought to myself Now we’re getting somewhere. Examining the image on the rear LCD screen confirmed another suspicion: I had a bit more wiggle room with depth of field, so I opened the aperture up a little to f/8.

That did the job. I now had the flower in focus as well as just a bit of the leaves immediately surrounding it, but everything else was beautifully blurry. Bingo. I only had about 2 or 3 minutes until the sun was fully above the horizon so I took a couple more shots from alternate angles, and then, satisfied, I stowed my gear and went to work–on time too, I might add :)

Editing this was pretty simple: adjust the shadows, bring down the highlights, add a bit of sharpening, and tweak the white balance just a hair. It all came together to produce a final image that, while not particularly outstanding, is still exactly what I set out to get: a good photo. Nothing I would want to print and frame on my wall, but at the same time, not bad either. And I had fun in the process, which is always a good thing too :)

One common refrain you might notice here on Weekly Fifty is that many of the shots I take involve a degree of serendipity: I encounter a photo opportunity while out walking around on campus or other such relatively benign activity. I rarely have something specific in mind, and I’m often just as surprised by the results as you, the reader, might be. This picture, though, is kind of the opposite. It required careful planning as well as timing (though one could argue that’s just two ways of saying the same thing) and also something entirely beyond my control: clear skies. Thankfully, everything came together just fine and the result is the shot you see here, along with a video of the three-hour time lapse condensed down to 11 seconds.

The setup here is surprisingly simple: I captured this scene very early in the morning on March 14, 2025, with my GoPro Hero 12 attached to a tripod in my own back yard. About a month earlier I heard that there would be a lunar eclipse and used the SkyGuide app (which I purchased about a decade ago) to figure out if I would even be able to see it from where we lived. Once I got the answer (a resounding yes) I thought about asking my neighbor if I could put my camera and tripod in his field to get a good clear shot, but the more I pondered the possibility the more I realized I could use the trees in our yard to my advantage. They would provide much-needed context, allowing you, the viewer, to get a sense of where the eclipse is and where you might be positioned if you saw it happen. The treetops visible on the edges of the frame give the sense that you are standing in a clearing with your head tipped upwards to watch the scene unfold, which is pretty much exactly how my GoPro was situated behind our house.

I used the Star Trails preset built in to the GoPro and set a timer for it to start at 12:30am, knowing that totality would be about 90 minutes later. Since the battery lasts roughly three hours on this kind of time lapse, I thought it would capture the entire eclipse from start to finish as the moon made its way through the earth’s shadow–and that’s exactly what ended up happening. I held my iPhone up next to the GoPro with SkyGuide open so I would know exactly where to aim the lens, and then I set the timer and went to bed.

One thing I have learned when taking Star Trails shots like this one is that sometimes they work, and sometimes they just don’t. You can plan everything just right but be stymied by bad weather, a full moon, passing clouds, or a number of unexpected issues. This time, though, everything just worked and worked beautifully. I still can’t quite believe how well the final photo turned out, especially because I won’t even have the chance to do this for a year since that’s when the next lunar eclipse will happen. And who knows, maybe I’ll have more ideas to try for capturing a picture of it by then :)

About a year and a half ago, my wife was gifted a very nice orchid that she has been happily caring for ever since. Neither one of us are what you might call plant people, but when we do come into possession of a pothos, potted cactus, or other such green growing thing we try to keep it around for as long as we can, as best we can. Sometimes it works, every now and then it doesn’t, but these plants are a fun to have around and a lot less work than a pet and that’s a good thing :) This orchid, which I have photographed before, has always presented a bit of a challenge: how to adequately take a picture of a flower that is mostly white, with the only color tucked away in the middle surrounded by petals on all sides? My previous images have been fine, but never quite worked how I wanted or envisioned them to be in my mind when I composed the shots. Something just didn’t quite work right, and it was tough to put my finger on it.

And then the flower went dormant. Its flowers fell and it just kind of sat there in its pot for months on end, not doing much of anything but not really dying either. Just…existing. My wife diligently maintained it though, with regular watering (soaking?) along with plenty of sunlight and then, one day, we noticed several green buds start to appear all around it. Not long after that they began opening and unfolding into brilliant flower petals, and that’s when I thought I would try my hand at another picture. Boy howdy did it ever work this time :)

The key to taking a picture of a white flower, I realized, was to just let it be what it is. Don’t try to change the color of the flower with light–instead, use light to enhance the location where the flower exists. I shot this after the sun went down, and the large frosted window behind the flower was completely dark. That meant I could control all the light, and create exactly the kind of scene I was hoping for. The color here comes from several Nanlite Pavotubes, all set to specific color and brightness values to get the shot I wanted.

On the left: three set to a deep orange/red mounted on a triangle metal frame, aimed not at the flower but at the frosted glass.

On the right: one set to dark blue, held in my hand and aimed once again not at the flower but at the background.

Behind the flower: one set to 2700K white light, aimed up for just a hint of translucence in the petals.

In front of the flower: one set to 2700K white light, held in my other hand and aimed at the flower to make the petals shine while also casting just a bit of shadow where the edges curved.

To create the photograph I used my Nikon D750 and 105mm macro lens on a tripod, with manual exposure (f/8, 1/15 second, ISO 100). I used a 10-second timer so I could press the shutter and then position the to handheld lights right where I wanted them. I took about two dozen shots, each one with minor alterations to the light and even the angle at which I was taking the picture, and in the end this emerged as my favorite. What works so well, in my opinion, are all the subtleties: rim lighting on the lower-left, shiny orange on the green buds, the gradient from blue to orange/red in the background, the petals at top just slightly out of focus to create a sense of depth, even the texture of the petal on the top right that’s only visible if you zoom way in. It’s my third time attempting a photograph of this orchid, and this time, indeed, was the charm.

This is one of those images for which I really had trouble coming up with a title. I usually don’t dwell on the title for more than a few seconds since it doesn’t really matter that much to me, and in the end just went for function over form. It happens :)

Every now and then I take a picture that fills me with an odd sense of deja vu. I can’t help but shake the feeling that I’ve seen it somewhere before, and that definitely happened here. I couldn’t quite place it though, and then after a while it hit me: It was strikingly similar to this shot I took way back on May 10, 2013, with my Nikon D200 and the same 50mm lens I use to this day. (Though perhaps not as much as back then, when it was the only lens I owned.) I liked the original so much that I used it as the masthead for Weekly Fifty, which you can still see if you go rooting around on the Wayback Machine :)

On some unconscious level I think I must have been channeling my younger self when I came across the scene you see on this week’s photo. I was on the OSU campus the morning after a long night of rain, hoping to take some photos of glossy greenery under overcast skies…but that luck simply did not pan out. By the time I went out with my camera nearly all signs of precipitation had evaporated, and instead of grey clouds there was a bright yellow sun and more than a bit of wind. It was, as one might charitably describe the situation, not ideal. And yet even in these kinds of circumstances it behooves one to keep his or her eye open and see what can be captured with a camera anyway. And when I saw this large brown leaf hanging down amidst a sea of yellow and orange, I knew I had found something worth photographing.

I tried to take my time and consider a few things when composing this photo, and I think it worked out pretty well. Of course I considered the basics of exposure: aperture, shutter, and ISO (though the latter are largely handled by Auto-ISO, but still…) as well as depth of field, sharpness, lighting, etc. You know–the fundamentals. But beyond that I really tried to pay close attention not just to the leaf on the left but the two on the right. I wanted them in the frame but blurry, and positioned such that they did not intrude on the subject or any other elements of the photograph. I also wanted an aperture that gave me just enough blurriness, but not too much. Basically, I knew I wanted the background to be just as important as the subject, and I adjusted my camera and composed the shot accordingly. And I think it worked. I quite like how everything came together in this photo, and the multiple layers work to create a composition that’s more than what you might see initially. (i.e. just a leaf.) I also like that I didn’t crop this at all: what you see here is what I shot, nothing more and nothing less. Things don’t always work out that way, but when they do it sure does feel good :)

And now I’m wondering if a decade from now I’ll take a picture of a leaf and think to myself “This reminds me of something…”

You know how anglers will sometimes tell the tale of the one that got away? How even though they might head home with an impressive haul, there’s till the story of the fish that they almost reeled in but managed to wriggle free at the last second? That’s this week’s image, in a manner of speaking. It bears some similarities to other photos I have posted recently, most notably this shot of a green cypress sprig lifting itself high in the early morning sun. when I came upon the scene you see here in early March I thought it would present an interesting opportunity to build on the original, as I am often wont to do, and even perhaps improve it in a couple of ways.

I liked how the rich yellow and gold color palette were distinctly different from the greens and browns one might expect in a shot like this. I also thought the angle of the foreground, going from lower-left to upper-right, presented a somewhat unique take on this type of composition compared to what I might normally do. And finally, the burnt umber bricks of the buildings in the background would, I thought, add an enticing element to the shot. Tie it together, in a sense, much like the Dude’s rug.

Even though I did take some care and attention to create this image, in the end it just didn’t work out how I expected. When I was editing it on my large iMac screen it looked fine, but when I saw it on my mobile phone I realized the problem: the subject in the center was nearly indistinguishable from the mess of oranges and dull reds that dominated the rest of the frame. It ceased to be interesting and became muddy and confusing, and what I thought would be a decent photograph ended up being somewhat of a counterexample–essentially, what not to do.

I know this all runs the risk of sounding a bit self-deprecating, but that’s not my intent. It’s just me giving an honest assessment of the photo, and trying to learn from what worked or, in this case, didn’t work as well as I had hoped. Lots of things were fine on a technical level (the subject is sharp, the colors are good, etc.) but the overall composition just falls short of where I want it to be. No matter though, I’ll keep at it and hopefully get a better image next time!